This means that a state-of-the-art laser altimeter must be included. It must include instruments to produce a detailed topographic map of the whole lunar surface. There are a number of other imperatives for the LRO instrument package. If the water is not there, or if it is there in forms that make it difficult to extract, then the whole project will need to be rethought. Water is the second most valuable substance in the solar system (the most valuable, of course, being human brainpower.) In his April 1st testimony before the House Science Committee, Paul Spudis said that, “We estimate that over 10 billion tons of water exist at the lunar poles.” If he’s right, then the vision to build the Moonbase, to perfect ISRU technology and then go on the Mars, will be possible within roughly the time frame laid out by President Bush. Choosing the right instruments to do this should be at the top of any list of priorities. It would be nice if the LRO can confirm or deny the presence of water ice in the dark craters of the south polar region. We know, for example, that there is plenty of hydrogen on the Moon, but we do not know what form it is in or what it is chemically bonded with. The meaning of the data from the 1994 Clementine and 1998 Lunar Prospector missions is still being debated. It can be assumed that the primary goal of this project is to map the Moon’s usable resources for planning ISRU technologies. Aside from the samples brought back from Apollo, there is still relatively little we know about the potential minerals-above all the water-that might exist on the Moon. #LUNAR RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER CODE#Based on the vision paper, it can be assumed that the primary goal of this project is to map the Moon’s usable resources so that Code T can begin to develop the technologies needed for in situ resource utilization (ISRU). The first requirement is to decide the goals of the LRO mission. Given the time it takes for missions such as the LRO to be designed, built, tested, and certified, the need to get the requirements right, and to do so fast, is an early test of Code T and Admiral Steidle’s ability to change the way things get done at NASA. Scheduled to be launched sometime in 2008, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) project is quickly approaching the point where some basic decisions have to be made. Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter: the cornerstone of the vision by Taylor Dinerman (2018) Precise orbits of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter from radiometric tracking data, Journal of Geodesy, 92(9), pp 989–1001, doi.org/10.1007/s0019-4.The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will be far more ambitious-and far larger-than recent missions to the Moon, like Lunar Prospector (above). (2018) Assessment of the impact of one-way laser ranging on orbit determination of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, Journal of Geodesy, doi.org/10.1007/s0019-9. #LUNAR RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER SOFTWARE#The orbits are provided here as SPK kernels for use with the Spice software system ( ).They are available in different flavours characterized by the arc length and the observation types used in the determination of the orbit. An independent set of such orbits was produced within the research unit FOR 1503 "Space-Time Reference Systems for Monitoring Global Change and for Precise Navigation in Space" funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). Referring these observations to a Moon-fixed reference frame requires highly accurate and consistent orbits. Since 2009, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) explores the lunar surface by images and altimetric ranges. Orbits of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |